California residents finally have a law designed to dismantle some of the secrecy around domestic acquisitions of warzone surveillance equipment.

The weapons of the United States military—drones, mobile command centers, sound cannons, and more—have been handed off to local law enforcement for years. The transfers have equipped police departments with the ability to redirect surveillance tools and the weapons of war designed for foreign adversaries toward often-faultless targets on U.S. soil. For police departments getting the gear, the process is often secretive. If you don’t think your local law enforcement really needs an aerial surveillance system, or for that matter an MRAP (Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected vehicle), there hasn’t been too much you can do to stop these from joining the arsenal at your neighborhood police department. 

A.B. 481 , a new California state law, went into effect at the beginning of May 2022 for equipment already in agencies’ possession and at the beginning of this year for new technologies. It requires democratic control of whether California state or local law enforcement agencies can obtain or use military-grade tools, whether they are received from the federal government, purchased, or utilized via some other channel. Through their elected officials, the public can say “no” to military surveillance and other technology, and it won’t be allowed to come to town.

A.B. 481 requires democratic control of whether California state or local law enforcement agencies can obtain or use military-grade tools, regardless of how it's obtained.

These democratic control measures include the creation of draft use policies that must be publicly posted, an opportunity for residents to organize and be heard, and a vote by the governing body at a public meeting. If the proposal is approved, the police then must provide regular reports on how the equipment has been used, and the public body must perform annual compliance reviews. The bill also mandates that agencies already in possession of military equipment obtain approval from the governing body by the end of 2022, or else stop using  them. 

A.B. 481 is modeled on Community Control of Police Surveillance ( CCOPS ) laws adopted in 18 communities across the country. It was sponsored by the The Women's Foundation of California, Women’s Policy Institute, Alliance for Boys and Men of Color, and The Stop Terror and Oppression by Police (STOP) Coalition. Where CCOPS ensures democratic control over local acquisition and use of all manner of surveillance technologies, A.B. 481 ensures democratic control over local acquisition and use of military technologies (including military surveillance technologies).

In California, there are more than 500 local law enforcement agencies, and the state is one of the biggest recipients of military transfers. In all, the federal program to transfer surplus military wares has moved more than $7.5 billion worth of equipment to local law enforcement since the program’s inception in 1990. 

Military equipment, for the purposes of the new law, encompasses a broad range of weapons and surveillance tools: 

It is important for there to be more transparency into law enforcement practices, and for communities to have democratic control of surplus military transfers , particularly for high-tech surveillance equipment. The enactment of A.B. 481 is an important step forward. 

It is important for there to be  more transparency  into law enforcement practices, and for communities to have  democratic control of surplus military transfers , particularly for high-tech surveillance equipment. 

The proposed “military equipment use policy” is now the first step of the process for agencies trying to get military gear. This is a publicly available, written document that would govern the state or local agency’s use of this military equipment. It needs to do a few things: 

A law enforcement agency then needs to get the approval of the jurisdiction’s governing body, like the City Council, in the form of a public meeting. The policy and other relevant materials need to be made available to the public on the agencies' website at least 30 days in advance. Residents who oppose the military equipment can use that month to organize in opposition.

Once approval is granted, the agency isn’t just free to use the equipment indefinitely. There will be an annual review for compliance with the use policy, based on an annual military equipment report. That report needs to contain: 

Agencies have started posting their materials online, like these from Milpitas and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation . Unfortunately, there have been rumblings from some in law enforcement against the need to disclose whether they have war-grade equipment. As we’ve seen in our compliance review of S.B. 978 , which requires California police departments to post their policies online, adherence to new accountability measures can’t be taken for granted. Still, whether they like it or not, A.B. 481 makes hiding military-grade tools against the law for law enforcement. 

EFF, along with many other organizations, has loudly sounded the alarm about data brokers and the myriad ways they can collect data on unsuspecting users, as well as the numerous dangers of public-private surveillance partnerships. One of the companies that has sometimes flown under the radar,...

In the hands of police and other government agencies, face recognition technology presents an inherent threat to our privacy, free expression, information security, and social justice. Our faces are unique identifiers that can’t be left at home, or replaced like a stolen ID or compromised password. The technology facilitates...

Too many young people – particularly young people of color – lack enough familiarity or experience with emerging technologies to recognize how artificial intelligence can impact their lives, in either a harmful or an empowering way. Educator Ora Tanner saw this and rededicated her career toward promoting tech literacy and...

When journalists want to know if and how local police or governments are using technology tools to surveil communities, one of the first people they call (or message on Signal) is Dave Maass, EFF Director of Investigations.Maass’ expertise in the use of police tech like automated license plate readers,...

Senator Ron Wyden has released a letter to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Inspector General voicing his concern over a previously-unknown bulk data collection program that was carried out by Homeland Security Investigations(HSI), a unit within DHS’s U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). For more than two...

San Francisco Mayor London Breed has pulled a harmful ballot initiative that threatened to gut the city’s landmark 2019 surveillance oversight ordinance. This withdrawal followed intense community pressure, including a coalition letter signed by over 30 San Francisco community and civil rights organizations, including EFF and ...

EFF, ACLU, and 34 other community and civil rights groups have signed onto a letter urging San Francisco’s Mayor and the Board of Supervisors not to gut the city’s landmark 2019 surveillance technology ordinance. Mayor London Breed recently introduced a proposed ballot initiative that would create massive exceptions...

Update: This post has been updated to reflect that the hearing date in this case has been moved to January 21.By Hope Williams, Nathan Sheard, and Nestor ReyesThe authors are community activists who helped organize and participated in protests against police violence in San Francisco after the murder of George...

This past year, EFF's Atlas of Surveillance project mobilized hundreds of student journalists and volunteer researchers to turn the tables on police spying by building the largest ever public-facing database of police surveillance technology. As EFF has long documented, local law enforcement agencies around the United States are...

A year after the police murder of George Floyd, Black-led protests against police violence continue, as does resistance to police departments across the country growing their surveillance toolbelts and unnecessarily amassing troves of personal data. EFF stands with protesters against police abuse, and stands up for the core rights...